Princess Margaret Was "Barely on Speaking Terms" With the Queen Mother Over One Controversy, Says Royal Author
Our take
The enduring fascination with the British Royal Family continues to yield surprising revelations, and the latest, detailed in Sarah Bradford’s biography of Queen Elizabeth, is particularly poignant. The revelation that Princess Margaret and the Queen Mother were “barely on speaking terms” over the Peter Townsend affair adds a new layer of complexity to a narrative already steeped in duty, heartbreak, and societal expectations. It underscores the immense pressure placed upon Margaret, caught between her personal desires and the rigid protocols of the monarchy. This isn't merely a footnote in royal history; it speaks to the profound sacrifices demanded of those born into such privilege, and the fractured family dynamics that often exist behind palace walls. The incident highlights a broader struggle within the royal family – the tension between tradition and individual happiness – a theme we've seen echoed in more recent years, as exemplified by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Pursuing an "English Countryside Dream," but They've Not Said "Goodbye Forever" to California, Per Royal Sources, where personal aspirations continue to navigate the complex currents of royal obligation.
The specifics of the disagreement, as Bradford details, revolve around the Queen Mother’s staunch disapproval of Townsend, a divorced man, and her perceived interference in Elizabeth’s decision-making process. The Queen Mother, a formidable figure in her own right, undoubtedly felt a strong sense of responsibility to uphold the institution’s values and protect the monarchy's reputation. However, Margaret’s longing for Townsend was deeply personal, and the Queen Mother’s actions, even if motivated by a sense of duty, created a significant rift. It's a stark reminder that even within the seemingly unified front of the Royal Family, internal conflicts and diverging loyalties can exist. Furthermore, this period in the 1950s was marked by a rapidly changing social landscape, with attitudes towards divorce slowly evolving. Margaret's predicament, therefore, became a symbol of the clash between old norms and emerging freedoms. Considering the recent loss within the family, and the King’s subsequent tribute, as documented in Palace Flags Are Flying at Half-Staff as King Charles Shares “Profound Sadness” Over the Loss of “Dear Cousin”, the weight of familial responsibility and the enduring impact of past decisions seem all the more pronounced.
What makes this particular revelation so compelling is the human element it injects into the often-sanitized portrayal of the Royal Family. We're accustomed to seeing them as emblems of national identity, symbols of tradition and stability. But Bradford’s account reminds us that they are, at their core, individuals grappling with complex emotions, familial pressures, and the constraints of their unique circumstances. Margaret's story, in particular, resonates because it embodies a sense of thwarted potential and unfulfilled longing. The fact that the Queen Mother’s disapproval was so profound as to sever communication speaks to the high stakes involved and the deep-seated convictions that governed her actions. It's a narrative of power dynamics, generational differences, and the enduring weight of royal expectation. The evolving perspectives on royal relationships, as reflected in discussions surrounding Lady Eliza Spencer’s thoughts on Prince Harry’s Cousin Shares Thoughts on His “Exciting” Return and What Meghan Markle Might Be Able to Give Her Advice About, further highlight the changing societal views on familial bonds and personal choices.
Ultimately, this account of the rift between Margaret and the Queen Mother serves as a valuable reminder of the human cost of upholding tradition. It prompts us to consider the sacrifices made by those within the Royal Family, and the complexities of navigating duty and personal happiness. Looking forward, it raises a pertinent question: will future generations of royals have more freedom to prioritize personal fulfillment, or will the weight of history and expectation continue to shape their lives in profound and potentially limiting ways? The ongoing scrutiny and evolving public perception of the monarchy suggest that the balance between tradition and individual agency will remain a defining challenge for the institution in the years to come.
Princess Margaret’s doomed relationship with Group Captain Peter Townsend has been documented—and dramatized—extensively through the decades. Queen Elizabeth’s younger sister wasn’t permitted to marry a divorced man and still retain her royal status, and after two years in limbo, made a public statement that she was choosing the Crown over love. But according to royal biographer Sarah Bradford, the drama surrounding the "Townsend affair" caused a rift between Margaret and the Queen Mother.
Margaret had fallen in love with her father’s much-older equerry, Townsend, who was a married man, but even after his divorce, it was made clear that the royal aide was an unsuitable match for the third-in-line to the throne. Townsend became comptroller of the Queen Mother’s household after King George VI’s death in 1952, and author Gyles Brandreth wrote that the relationship was swiftly denounced by courtiers when Margaret and Townsend approached Queen Elizabeth ahead of her coronation.
“Martin Charteris, then the Queen’s assistant private secretary, said to me, ‘I don’t think he was mad or bad, but he was naïve,” Brandreth wrote in Elizabeth: An Intimate Portrait. “He was a commoner and a divorcee.”
Noting that divorced people couldn’t be “presented at court” or even “formally introduced to royalty,” Charteris told Brandreth that he didn’t believe there “was ever a serious prospect of a marriage.”
But Princess Margaret and Townsend held on to hope. Queen Elizabeth asked them to wait a year, given the coronation and her new role, but the Queen Mother “seemingly put the matter out of her mind,” Brandreth wrote, noting that Charteris called it “the old ostrich approach.”
Sarah Bradford went further in her biography of Queen Elizabeth. Recounting the night that Princess Margaret released a statement saying she’d “decided not to marry Group Captain Peter Townsend,” Bradford wrote that the stress had left the Queen Mother in deep distress.
Noting that the Queen Mother “kept an official engagement at London University” that evening, Bradford wrote, “The Queen Mother did not say goodnight to her daughter on her return. For some time they had barely been on speaking terms; the Townsend affair had been as traumatic as the Abdication had for Queen Mary.”
The author added that between King George VI’s death, Queen Elizabeth’s marriage to Prince Philip and Princess Margaret’s love affair, there was a feeling that the strong “family bonds” between Elizabeth, Margaret and their mother had been “weakened.”
Brandreth questions Bradford’s account of the story, noting that although the dynamic between the three royals had certainly charged due to huge changes in their lives, the Queen Mother’s behavior on the night of Margaret’s renunciation wasn’t peculiar.
“Of course, the Queen Mother fulfilled a long-standing official engagement. Duty always comes first,” he wrote. Brandreth also pointed out that the Queen Mother once wrote in a letter to Princess Margaret that October, “It is so difficult talking of anything personal on the telephone, because one feels that so many people are listening most eagerly.”
Princess Margaret went on to marry (and later divorce) Anthony Armstrong-Jones and never remarried, while Townsend started a new life in Belgium with a bride who, as Brandreth noted, "looked uncannily like the teenage Princess Margaret."
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience