3 min readfrom Latest from Marie Claire

Queen Elizabeth "Never Really Liked" One of Her Royal Residences and Often "Couldn't Wait" to Leave, Says Former Royal Chef

Our take

Darren McGrady, former Royal Chef to Queen Elizabeth, has revealed a surprising detail about the late monarch's preferences: she reportedly didn’t favor all of her residences equally. McGrady disclosed that the Queen often "couldn't wait" to leave one particular royal home, suggesting a strong personal preference for other locations. This insight offers a rare glimpse into the Queen's private sentiments regarding her official duties and the spaces she inhabited.
 Queen Elizabeth "Never Really Liked" One of Her Royal Residences and Often "Couldn't Wait" to Leave, Says Former Royal Chef

The revelation that Queen Elizabeth II harbored a distinct aversion to one of her royal residences, and reportedly "couldn't wait" to leave, as shared by former royal chef Darren McGrady, offers a fascinating glimpse beyond the carefully curated image of regal duty and unwavering composure. While the specifics of which residence held less appeal remain somewhat ambiguous, the sentiment itself is striking. It disrupts the ingrained perception of the Queen as seamlessly inhabiting each of her homes, a symbol of steadfastness and national identity. It feels almost…human. We've recently explored the evolving landscape of personal style with [The 9 Best Hair Accessories for Summer 2026 Are for the Fashion Girls], highlighting how even within traditionally structured environments, individual expression thrives. Similarly, the pursuit of alignment over mere success, as discussed in [There comes a moment in life when you realise that success and alignment are not always the same thing. For a long time…], resonates with this unveiling of a personal preference within a life defined by public expectation. The King’s recent Sovereign Grant Report, revealing a substantial tax payment, only underscores the financial realities underpinning even the most opulent of royal lives, adding another layer of context to this personal disclosure.

McGrady’s comments tap into a wider cultural fascination with the interior lives of public figures. We are constantly seeking cracks in the façade, moments of vulnerability that remind us of their shared humanity. The meticulous planning and orchestration often associated with the Royal Family can sometimes obscure the individual within, and these small, unexpected details—a dislike of a particular palace—offer a fleeting sense of intimacy. The stories surrounding royal residences themselves are often steeped in history, symbolism, and national pride. Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, Balmoral – each holds a significant place in the British psyche. To learn that the Queen, the embodiment of that history and pride, didn’t entirely cherish one of them challenges that deeply held reverence, albeit in a quiet, understated way. Zara’s new collection, [Zara’s Metallic Beach Edit Is Made for Golden Hour], embodies a similar desire for personal expression—a curated aesthetic that reflects individual taste and mood, mirroring the Queen's own unspoken preference.

The significance of this story extends beyond mere royal gossip. It speaks to a broader shift in how we perceive public figures, particularly those associated with tradition and institution. The era of unquestioning deference is waning, replaced by a desire for authenticity and transparency. While the Royal Family undoubtedly maintains a strong connection to its heritage and traditions, there's a growing expectation for glimpses behind the curtain, a recognition that even monarchs are individuals with their own preferences and feelings. McGrady’s candidness, coming from someone who worked closely with the Queen, suggests a willingness within the royal orbit to allow for a more nuanced portrayal of the late monarch, moving beyond the purely ceremonial and embracing a more human dimension. It's a subtle but potentially significant evolution in the Royal Family's relationship with the public.

Ultimately, McGrady’s anecdote prompts us to consider how we construct and perpetuate narratives about those in positions of power. Do we expect them to be flawless representations of their roles, or do we allow for the complexities of human nature? As King Charles navigates his own reign and the Royal Family continues to adapt to a changing world, will we see further revelations that challenge our preconceived notions? Will the emphasis on personal preference and individual expression extend to other members of the Royal Family, and will this reshaping of perception ultimately strengthen or diminish the institution’s appeal? It's a question worth observing as the monarchy continues to evolve in the 21st century.

When Buckingham Palace released its Sovereign Grant Report on June 25, the monarch’s tax bill was revealed for the first time in history, revealing that King Charles has paid $39 million in taxes since taking the throne in 2022. But along with the Royal Family’s finances, the report also revealed that The King and Queen never plan on moving into Buckingham Palace. The decision comes as no surprise based on The King and Prince William moving toward a more modern monarchy, but Queen Elizabeth was never entirely fond of living in London, either.

Former royal chef Darren McGrady once told Coffee Friend that Queen Elizabeth “never really liked the palace,” explaining that Buckingham Palace had “always been the office to the (late) Queen.”

“The Queen would always be whizzing off back to Windsor Castle,” he added, explaining she usually couldn’t “wait to get back there.”

The exterior of Buckingham Palace with tourists in front

King Charles will not be moving into Buckingham Palace, the Royal Family confirmed. (Image credit: Getty Images)

In 2020, the late Queen relocated to Windsor Castle permanently and remained there until shortly before her 2022 death, when she traveled to Balmoral Castle for her annual summer stay.

“Nearly no member of the royal family has ever enjoyed living at Buckingham Palace,” royal commentator Giselle Bastin of Flinders University told ABC News Australia, adding the building isn't “conducive to cozy family living” and it “feels a little like ‘living above the shop.’”

Although Queen Elizabeth chose to follow tradition by living at Buckingham Palace, King Charles and Prince William are more willing to make their own rules as the monarchy moves toward the future.

Queen Elizabeth waving on the balcony of Buckingham Palace with members of the Royal Family

Queen Elizabeth is pictured with her family during her Platinum Jubilee in 2022. (Image credit: Getty Images)

Clarence House remains the London home of The King and Queen, and they also spend a fair amount of time in the countryside, with both of Their Majesties owning retreats outside of the city. The King loves spending time at Highgrove House in Gloucestershire, while Queen Camilla relaxes at Ray Mill House in Wiltshire.

As for Prince William and his family, they moved into Forest Lodge, a Georgian mansion in Windsor Great Park, in autumn 2025, and reports indicate that the future King intends it to be his "forever home."

Instead of continuing as a home for the Royal Family, Buckingham Palace will remain the central headquarters for the monarchy. “It will remain a working home but we are seeking to widen public access precisely to maximise the national benefit of a publicly-funded building,” the palace reported.

Read on the original site

Open the publisher's page for the full experience

View original article

Tagged with

#style tips#Buckingham Palace#Queen Elizabeth#Windsor Castle#Royal Family#King Charles#Prince William#Sovereign Grant#Monarchy#Royal Residences#Balmoral Castle#Former Royal Chef#Darren McGrady#London#Tax Bill#Royal Finances#Modern Monarchy#Giselle Bastin#Tradition#Royal Commentator