What does it look like when a designer "hates women"?
Our take

The recent Reddit thread questioning what a design aesthetic that "hates women" might look like, sparked by praise for Carolina Herrera’s latest collection, is a fascinating entry point into a much larger conversation about representation, power, and the often-unconscious biases embedded within the fashion industry. It’s a conversation that moves beyond simple aesthetics and delves into the cultural impact of clothing—how it shapes perceptions of femininity, reinforces societal expectations, and ultimately, impacts the lived experiences of women. The user’s admission of limited fashion knowledge actually strengthens the value of the question; it highlights how even casual observers are beginning to scrutinize the narratives being constructed around design and its relationship to gender. This resonates with the broader discussion we’ve been having about authenticity and mindful consumption, as explored in our recent piece [Random Fashion Thoughts - September 16, 2026], where we considered how increasingly consumers are demanding more transparency and ethical consideration from brands. The inherent subjectivity in defining “loving” or “hating” women through design further complicates the issue, demanding a nuanced understanding beyond surface-level appreciation.
Defining a design aesthetic that “hates women” isn’t about intentionally malicious intent; it's far more often about the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes and the exclusion of diverse experiences. Historically, fashion has often catered to a narrow ideal of feminine beauty – one that prioritizes unrealistic body types, restrictive silhouettes, and an emphasis on male gaze. Think of designs that overtly sexualize women, those that confine movement or emphasize fragility, or those that actively exclude different body shapes and sizes. These aren’t necessarily conscious choices, but they reflect a lack of understanding or empathy for the complexities of female identity. Conversely, a design approach that "loves women," as suggested by the praise for Carolina Herrera, might prioritize comfort, functionality, and inclusivity, celebrating diverse body types and offering garments that empower women to feel confident and authentic in their own skin. This aligns with the thoughtful approach we champion, focusing on garments that are not just beautiful but also serve a purpose and reflect a deeper understanding of the wearer. It’s also important to consider the context of production; as detailed in [We spent months building a sustainable, insulated loungewear brand, made 100% in Europe. Here is how we started (and why most "new" fashion isn't really that green).], ethical considerations and responsible manufacturing practices are integral to a truly empowering and respectful approach to fashion.
The discussion also reveals a growing desire for fashion to be more than just a superficial expression of style. It’s becoming a platform for social commentary, a vehicle for challenging norms, and a means of fostering inclusivity. The questions raised in the Reddit thread are a direct reflection of this shift—a desire to understand the underlying values and beliefs that shape the clothes we wear. This resonates with the broader trend of conscious consumerism, where individuals are increasingly scrutinizing brands and designers not just for their aesthetic appeal, but also for their ethical and social impact. Our Daily Questions Thread September 16, 2026 demonstrates this ongoing dialogue, providing a space for individuals to explore their personal style and seek advice while considering broader questions of sustainability and inclusivity. Ultimately, it pushes the industry to move beyond simply creating beautiful clothes and to consider the profound impact that fashion has on shaping our perceptions of ourselves and the world around us.
Looking ahead, it’s crucial to foster a more critical and informed dialogue around design and its relationship to gender. We need to move beyond simplistic labels like “loving” or “hating” and engage in a deeper exploration of the nuances of representation and power within the fashion industry. How can designers actively challenge harmful stereotypes and create garments that celebrate the diversity of female experiences? Will we see a continued shift toward more inclusive sizing, adaptable designs, and a greater emphasis on functionality and comfort? Perhaps the most pertinent question is: how can we, as consumers, become more discerning and demand greater accountability from the brands we support, ensuring that fashion truly empowers and celebrates all women?
| So I've been seeing a lot of posts lately about the latest Carolina Herrera collection. People are applauding Wes Gordon as a designer who "loves women" and it shows in his designs. I have always admired the CH aesthetic, and I agree this collection was so lovely. But it also got me wondering about the opposite. Can you show me examples of designs that "hate women"? P.S. I don't know much about fashion, fashion houses, or designers. I'm just a casual observer who would love to learn more from those more familiar with this world. [link] [comments] |
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience